This prep is needed by Sunday 26 Jan.
The Brief
Felix needs UK-specific OKRs for Q1 2026 in the Global Leadership spreadsheet. Focus on outcomes, not activities. Due by end of Sunday.
Context
The 2026 target of β¬21.3M was set with 55-60% confidence at planning time. Q1 has two strategic "rocks" to get right: Lead Prioritisation and Campaign Excellence.
Two new markets launching in H1: Conservatories (Jan/Feb) and Ireland (April). These are the growth engines that need OKR focus.
Last year's OKRs were too activity-focused ("launch X", "do Y") rather than outcome-focused ("achieve X revenue", "reach Y conversion rate").
Web Research
Measure What Matters (John Doerr)
OKRs should be ambitious (70% achievement = success), measurable, and time-bound. Objectives are qualitative and inspirational. Key Results are quantitative and specific.
What Makes a Good OKR
Good KRs answer 'how will we know if we've achieved the objective?' Bad ones describe activities instead of outcomes.
View source βInternal Research
UK Strategy 2026 Presentation
Three pillars: Core growth (pergolas), Market expansion (conservatories, Ireland), Infrastructure (leads, ops). β¬21.3M target breakdown by quarter available.
outputs/uk-strategy-2026-presentation.md 2026 Priorities Doc
Q1 priorities: Conservatory launch readiness, Ireland pipeline building, lead scoring improvements, campaign calendar locked.
vault/Notes/Work/Pergolux/2026-priorities.md Previous OKR Feedback
Felix's feedback: 'Too many activities, not enough outcomes. I want to see metrics that tell me if we're winning.'
vault/Meetings/2025-Q4-review.md Key Findings
OKRs should be outcome-focused (β¬ revenue, % conversion) not activity-focused (launch X, build Y)
Three clear focus areas emerge: Conservatories launch, Ireland prep, Lead infrastructure
70% confidence = ambitious but achievable. Current targets are at 55-60%, so stretch is appropriate
Felix wants fewer, better OKRs - quality over quantity
Q1 success sets the tone for the year - these need to land
Recommendation
Structure around three objectives, each with 2-3 measurable key results:
- Conservatories β Launch and prove the model with β¬110K revenue target
- Ireland β Build the pipeline and team readiness for April launch
- Lead Infrastructure β Fix the fundamentals with 28% connection rate
Keep it tight. Felix has been clear: outcomes over activities. Every KR should answer "how will we know we succeeded?"
The Draft
Objective 1: Successfully launch Conservatories as a revenue-generating product line
KR1: Achieve β¬110K conservatory revenue by end of Q1 KR2: Reach 15% quote-to-order conversion rate on conservatory leads KR3: Maintain 4.5+ star customer rating on first 20 installations
Objective 2: Build Ireland market readiness for April launch
KR1: Pipeline of β¬500K qualified opportunities by March 31 KR2: Hire and onboard 2 sales consultants by March 15 KR3: Complete 5 reference installations with photo/video assets
Objective 3: Fix lead infrastructure to maximise conversion efficiency
KR1: Achieve 28% lead connection rate (vs 19% current) KR2: Reduce average lead response time to under 4 hours KR3: Implement lead scoring with 80% accuracy on hot/cold prediction
Next Steps
Additional Notes
Any extra context, questions, or open items can go here in the markdown body. This section is free-form for anything that doesnβt fit the structured sections above.
Open Questions
- Should Ireland KRs include specific city/region targets?
- Is the β¬110K conservatory target aligned with Felixβs expectations?
- Do we need team-level OKRs or just country-level?